Why is Photoresist Thinner Better?

03 Mar.,2025

 

Resist-Wiki: Thinner - Allresist EN

Correct dilution of resists (see 'Dilution of resists')

You will get efficient and thoughtful service from Boyang.

Resists are mainly composed of solvents. The majority of photoresists and the negative-tone e-beam resists utilize PGMEA (PMA) as main solvent. This solvent is consequently also the most commonly used thinner and offered by us as AR 300-12. PGMEA is often also used for the removal of edge beads (see Removal or minimizing of edge beads during coating).

We strongly recommend using only the recommended thinner for the dilution of resists. The solid content can of course also be reduced with other solvents. The solubility features of acetone, isopropanol, dioxane, butyl acetate and others would lead to a complete dissolution of all solid components, but the coating behavior of the resist would often change dramatically and high surface quality could only be obtained in exceptional cases.

For PMMA e-beam lithography, different solvents like chlorobenzene, anisole and ethyl lactate are used. Each of these solvents is also available as thinner: chlorobenzene as AR 600-01, anisole as AR 600-02 and ethyl lactate as AR 600-09. A further solvent of PMMA copolymers is methoxy propanol which is offered as AR 600-07.

For the various spray resists, special conditions apply. The resist solvent is composed of fast-drying and film-forming components. The solvent composition for spray resists was optimized with great effort. Already minor changes of the solvent composition cause vastly different coating features. For this reason, exclusively the original thinner should be used here. With the exception of the thinner-mixtures of spray resists, all other (pure) thinners may be used far beyond the expiration date. These thinners contain no components which are subjected to changes.

In search of a better photoresist - Pretending to Software

Photoresist difficulties

Not much to report from this last week, unfortunately. I printed a test enclosure for the lenses and a slide holder, then proceeded to test different exposure times with the photoresist.

The goal was to find the shortest time on the projector so that I could evaluate if the projector is sufficient, or if I need to start working on integrating the laser.

It was all sidetracked by problems with the photoresist. Or rather, developing the resist. Many consumer resists are developed in an alkaline solution, ranging from the relatively mild sodium carbonate through sodium metasilicate and ending at potassium or sodium hydroxide.

I assumed this random photoresist from China would be similar. I assumed incorrectly :)

Alkaline solutions do appear to loosen the resist, and allow it to slough off in big sheets when agitated manually. But the resist doesn't dissolve, and doesn't maintain any reasonable resolution.

Are you interested in learning more about Photoresist Thinner? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!

I've tried several different concentrations of sodium carbonate, metasilicate and NaOH. I've tried manually agitating, sloshing, dunking in alternating developer/distilled water baths, pipetting forcefully. I even tried a few where the solution was heated to ~70C. No dice.

The eBay listing is not terrible helpful either:

Organic solvents do, indeed, remove uncured resist very well. Acetone will aggressively dissolve it, as will less-volatile solvents like lacquer thinner and MEK. The problem is that they the cured sections are visibly disturbed by the solvent. When viewed under a microscope, the cured resist becomes somewhat clumpy, with frayed edges and pieces starting to lift off.

This appears somewhat standard for negative resists. The literature says that the semiconductor industry moved away from negative resists in part because of their lower resolution. Cured resist remains somewhat soluble in the developer, which causes some accidental removal as well as 'bloating' the cured section.

So I may just be seeing an extreme version (due to inferior quality resist) of what the industry already knows. In any case, I doubt I can achieve any kind of resolution with an organic solvent as developer and this particular resist.

Moving forward

So I'm back to hunting for a better resist. I've continued enquiring with smaller semiconductor supply houses if I can get a small order / sample of resist, but no luck so far.

In the mean time, I have two more resists on the way:

ER-71, a negative photoresist from Datak. PC-197, a positive novolac photoresist from Injectorall I also purchased the 'official' developer for each resist, just to rule out any variables. I can experiment with recreating the developers later if it works. I'm particularly excited for the PC-197 because it's a positive resist that appears to be chemically similar to semiconductor-grade resists (e.g. probably a DNQ-novolac resin). It is, unfortunately, very expensive.

So that's where I'm at. While waiting for new supplies to arrive, I think I'm going to start modeling out an enclosure that incorporates the laser. The projector light seems sufficient to develop, but only after long exposure times (15+ min).

The company is the world’s best Photoresist Ancillaries supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.